Lars Fløe Nielsen

Some of you might read my post last week about the Sitecore upgrade strategy. In this respect, the tool for upgrading your web site to version 6 was released in an Alpha version.

This is already being tested by several developers, and so far responses have been positive. Ivan Shamarok has even blogged about it: http://sitecoregadgets.blogspot.com/2008/07/migrate-from-....

I decided to give it a try with my own little hobby project, which I would consider a fairly standard best practice web site, - with (multiple) data inheritance models and extensive use of standard values/masters. I also use a single proxy item.

As a twist, however, the site is a combination of editing/extranet site where the core and the public site would use the same security database. Another layer of complexity is that the user is allowed to edit their personal profile information. This, - I knew, would have to be addressed specifically (re-coded to Sitecore 6) as user objects would no longer reside in Sitecore, but in the .NET security database. According to documentation, this should be the only possible breaking change that requires recoding.

Before the conversion, I decided not to transfer Archive and Recycle Bin as both were empty, rendering these steps useless.

The database conversion took me 45 minutes; - even with such disturbance only a baby daughter playing on your lap can give you. In the data structure test I did after the conversion, I didn’t find a single conflict or issue. I was especially impressed that roles and users were moved so easily from the older structure to the new structure.

In the evening, I decided to address the issue of recoding the user profile editor. I grabbed the new user object which holds a property bag of all profile information (it wraps the .NET profile bag and simplifies read/write operations). I reckon recoding this took me less than half an hour to code and test (no baby on lap though).

Here’s my evaluation of the tool:

1. So far, - It seems to work without flaws. During my conversion, I didn’t found any issues. Off course, this is an Alpha, and I would love to hear about others experiences with the upgrade tool.
   
2. The process of upgrading your solution is around 10 steps. These steps all, except for two, seems mandatory, - and here comes my only “complaint” (I know this is being considered by the team): Why not create a single “go”-button that executes all steps? Optionally an “advanced” mode that switches into the current step-by-step mode (for those who have made significant customizations to the system). Anyways, - it’s a matter of saving 10-15 minutes.
   
3. The documentation is very comprehensive: It explains each step that you go through, - in detail, with screen-shots. In addition, it explains what you should be aware of, - given your solution is highly customized, - and what you should do to solve it.